MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409392201 · doi:10.1016/j.hcr.2025.100026

Factors influencing dietary behavior among elderly patients with hypertension in Wenzhou, China: A qualitative descriptive study

2025· article· en· W4409392201 on OpenAlexaff
Ping Zou, Huiyun Luo, Yeqin Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare and Rehabilitation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaDescriptive researchQualitative researchEnvironmental healthGerontologyMedicineGeographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More than half of the elderly in China have high blood pressure. Dietary management is essential for maintaining ideal blood pressure levels and reducing the risk of hypertension-related complications. However, dietary management of elderly patients with hypertension in China is insufficient, and factors affecting their dietary behaviors are unclear. To explore the factors that may affect dietary behavior among Chinese elderly patients with hypertension. This was a descriptive qualitative study. Fifteen older adults were recruited from a hospital and community in Wenzhou, China, from January 2020 to December 2020. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, and content analysis was used for data analysis. Three main themes emerged from the data: personal cognition and perception, availability of dietary advice, and social environment. Factors influencing dietary behavior were identified at the individual, information received, and social levels. Personal cognition is the basis for formation of dietary behavior, and applicability of dietary advice and social environment affect the continuity of dietary behavior. Diverse factors affected dietary behavior among Chinese elderly patients with hypertension. Diet management programs should assess patients’ cognition and perception, availability of dietary advice, and social environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare and Rehabilitation→Same topicNutritional Studies and Diet→French-language works237,207→