MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409396054 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-94087-x

Intelligent event trigger based sliding mode control in a marine current turbine with superconducting magnetic energy storage

2025· article· en· W4409396054 on OpenAlexaff
Asit Mohanty, Agileswari K. Ramasamy, Renuga Verayiah, Sthitapragyan Mohanty, Reji Kumar Rajamony, Haiter Lenin Allasi, Pragyan Paramita Mohanty

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFrequency Control in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
FundersTenaga Nasional Berhad
KeywordsSuperconducting magnetic energy storageEnergy storageCurrent (fluid)SuperconductivityTurbineMode (computer interface)Computer scienceEvent (particle physics)Control (management)Electrical engineeringAutomotive engineeringSuperconducting magnetPhysicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringPower (physics)Operating systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marine current turbines (MCTs) are a burgeoning renewable energy technology that may effectively capture the kinetic energy of ocean currents to produce power. Nevertheless, the sporadic and uncertain characteristics of marine currents present substantial obstacles to the reliable functioning of grid-connected MCT systems. By incorporating Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) into grid-connected marine current turbines and implementing intelligent event-triggered Sliding Mode Control (ETSMC), we can significantly improve the transient voltage stability of marine renewable energy systems. The sophisticated event trigger mechanism continuously checks the circumstances of the grid and the operation of the turbine in real-time. The real-time nonlinear control technique enhances the performance of SMES by effectively regulating the flow of active and reactive power, hence ensuring grid stability during transient occurrences. This integrated system aims to improve the dependability and effectiveness of marine current turbine operations, thereby supporting the progress of sustainable marine renewable energy technologies. The resilience of the system was evaluated by its implementation in real-time on a dSPACE-DS1104 board, which was connected to an experimental laboratory bench. Additionally, a comprehensive analysis was conducted by comparing actual and simulated data in order to assess both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicFrequency Control in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207