What Role for Local Communities in the Conservation of the Bontioli Forest, Burkina Faso?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The decline of forests in many countries has prompted governments to adopt conservation measures for forest resources. In the total and partial wildlife reserves of Bontioli, forest conservation appears difficult to implement despite the state's adoption of so-called participatory management approaches. Forest cover loss persists due to the combined effects of natural and human factors. Authorities are attempting to preserve the forest in a context of growing local needs, driven—though not exclusively—by demographic pressure. Using a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative data, we mapped this forest retreat and analyzed its underlying causes. We also examined local perceptions of forest conservation. While forest decline is widely acknowledged and lamented, it highlights divergent views between authorities and local populations regarding concepts such as deforestation and conservation. The diversity of perceptions, depending on place of residence and the level of dependence on the land resources of the Bontioli reserves, also plays a key role in the acceptance of policies aimed at forest preservation. For sustainable forest management, the development of socio-economic infrastructure, the transformation of a part of the reserve into an agroforestry park, and the ongoing consultation of local communities emerge as effective solutions for safeguarding the forest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".