MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409403013 · doi:10.3389/fmars.2025.1553509

Life stage and seasonal habitat use of the porbeagle Lamna nasus in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean

2025· article· en· W4409403013 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brooke N. Anderson, Neil Hammerschlag, Steven Saul, Jon F. Dodd, Heather D. Bowlby, Yun Hee Kang, Austin J. Gallagher, James A. Sulikowski

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Marine Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersAmerican Elasmobranch SocietyArizona State University
KeywordsStage (stratigraphy)OceanographyHabitatFisheryGeographyClimatologyEcologyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For highly mobile marine species such as pelagic elasmobranchs, the development of effective spatial management requires a comprehensive understanding of movement ecology. Research incorporating movement data across seasons and life stages, including reproductive states, is valuable for informing spatial management, yet is absent for most species. In the Northwest (NW) Atlantic Ocean (hereafter referred to as NW Atlantic), the porbeagle shark Lamna nasus is a pelagic species that is overfished, has a live retention ban (Canada) or landings regulations (United States), and is also commonly captured incidentally as bycatch. Research on the spatiotemporal dynamics of NW Atlantic porbeagle habitat use is limited, with all previous research utilizing pop-off satellite archival tags that are prone to large uncertainty in location estimates. This study used higher-accuracy fin-mount satellite tags to identify patterns in habitat use across life stages and seasons for porbeagle sharks tagged off the northeastern coast of the United States. During the summer and fall, the 95% kernel density estimate (referred to as “activity space”) of tagged porbeagles occurred almost exclusively on the continental shelf in the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank. Activity space expanded and shifted southwards to include offshore environments during the winter and spring for juveniles, mature non-gravid females, and mature females of unknown reproductive states, while the activity space of mature males and gravid females remained in shelf waters year-round. This finding differs from the previous assumption that southward migrations are linked to reproduction for NW Atlantic porbeagles. Tagged porbeagles were also found to have a relatively small 50% kernel density estimate (referred to as “high occupancy area”) located around Cape Cod, Massachusetts that was well-conserved across life stages and seasons. This relatively static, small high occupancy area has implications for the population’s conservation given the high amount of fishing activity (rod-and-reel, trawl, gillnet) occurring within this region. Given the overlap between porbeagle high occupancy area and fishing activity, as well as the relatively high recapture rate of tagged sharks (10.5%), the coastal waters around Cape Cod, Massachusetts should be considered for spatial management of the NW Atlantic porbeagle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Marine ScienceSame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207