MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409404996 · doi:10.1155/atr/2728376

An Improved Kernelized Correlation Filter for Extracting Traffic Flow in Satellite Videos

2025· article· en· W4409404996 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dudu Guo, Hongbo Shuai, Jie Zhang, Yan Wang, Miao Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSatelliteTraffic flow (computer networking)Computer scienceFilter (signal processing)Flow (mathematics)CorrelationArtificial intelligenceComputer visionEngineeringMathematicsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In satellite video vehicle tracking, due to the tracking failure and tracking loss caused by similar characteristics of the target and obstacle occlusion, respectively, the traffic flow extraction accuracy is reduced. To address these issues, an improved traffic flow extraction method for satellite video based on kernelized correlation filter (KCF) was proposed. First, we introduced a multifeature fusion strategy into the KCF based on the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) framework to enhance vehicle tracking accuracy and reduce tracking drift and jumps. Second, we utilized the Kalman filter for trajectory prediction to reduce the loss of target during vehicle tracking. Compared with other mainstream algorithms on the satellite video dataset, the results showed that the tracking accuracy and success rate of the proposed method reached 86.74% and 79.96%, respectively. Finally, the virtual detection line method was used to extract the traffic flow. The experimental results showed that compared with the real traffic flow data obtained by visual method, the accuracy of satellite video traffic flow extraction by virtual detection line was 98.48% under noncongestion condition and 90.18% under congestion condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207