MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409405116 · doi:10.1186/s12917-025-04665-4

Genomic characterization of plasmids of mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli isolated from cohabiting rats, dairy cattle and pigs

2025· article· en· W4409405116 on OpenAlexaff
Johana E. Dominguez, Florencia Martino, Rosario Lovera, Natalia A. Casanova, Christine Seah, Regino Cavia, Alejandra Corso, Roberto G. Melano, Diego Faccone, Mariano E. Fernández-Miyakawa

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Veterinary Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Ontario
FundersInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
KeywordsEscherichia coliPlasmidDairy cattleBiologyMicrobiologyMCR-1Cattle DiseasesEnterobacteriaceaeVeterinary medicineBiotechnologyGeneticsGeneMedicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance has become a significant global issue impacting humans, animals, and the environment. Currently, the focus of concern has shifted to the environment, which can act as a reservoir and significantly contribute to the spread of resistance genes. This study aimed to elucidate the potential transmission of mcr-1, which confers colistin resistance, among Escherichia coli isolates from pigs, dairy cattle, and co-habiting rodents. In March 2018, 30 fecal samples were collected from three pig farms and one mixed cattle farm, and 31 cecal contents from rats (Rattus norvegicus) captured from the same four animal farms were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 26 mcr-1 positive E. coli isolates, 16 came from six rats, 10 from four pigs, and none from dairy cattle. The mcr-1-positive isolates from cohabiting rats and pigs were genetically unrelated, based on different XbaI-PFGE profiles. The plasmid profiles of one isolate per animal from each farm were analyzed by S1-PFGE. E. coli isolates from cohabiting rats and pigs showed plasmid bands of similar sizes (33 or 65 kb). To investigate the horizontal transfer of these plasmids between the animals, two pairs of E. coli isolates from pig farms 1 and 3 were selected for WGS analysis. Three of the isolates (EcoP3-1, EcoC2-1 from pigs, and Eco1266-6 from a rat) belonged to clonal complex 10 (CC10), while the other rat isolate (Eco1284-6) belonged to CC398 (ST398). Eco1266-6 (rat) and EcoC2-1 (pig) from cohabiting animals in pig farm 1 carried IncX4 plasmids with the mcr-1.1 variant. The plasmid sequences were almost identical (99.98% identity), both carrying the mcr-1.1/pap2 segment. pEcoC2-1 had a complete ISVsa5 insertion sequence upstream of the mcr-1 gene. Eco1284-6 (rat) and EcoP3-1 (pig) from pig farm 3 carried IncI2 plasmids with different allelic variants of mcr-1 (mcr-1.5 and mcr-1.1). CONCLUSIONS: E. coli isolates from cohabiting rats and pigs were genetically distinct, but one pair of isolates had very similar IncX4 plasmids, suggesting the potential for horizontal spread of plasmids carrying mcr genes. These findings suggest a threat of resistant E. coli spreading between cohabiting animals and into the environment. This underscores the importance of conducting integrated One-Health studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Veterinary ResearchSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207