Genomic characterization of plasmids of mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli isolated from cohabiting rats, dairy cattle and pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance has become a significant global issue impacting humans, animals, and the environment. Currently, the focus of concern has shifted to the environment, which can act as a reservoir and significantly contribute to the spread of resistance genes. This study aimed to elucidate the potential transmission of mcr-1, which confers colistin resistance, among Escherichia coli isolates from pigs, dairy cattle, and co-habiting rodents. In March 2018, 30 fecal samples were collected from three pig farms and one mixed cattle farm, and 31 cecal contents from rats (Rattus norvegicus) captured from the same four animal farms were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 26 mcr-1 positive E. coli isolates, 16 came from six rats, 10 from four pigs, and none from dairy cattle. The mcr-1-positive isolates from cohabiting rats and pigs were genetically unrelated, based on different XbaI-PFGE profiles. The plasmid profiles of one isolate per animal from each farm were analyzed by S1-PFGE. E. coli isolates from cohabiting rats and pigs showed plasmid bands of similar sizes (33 or 65 kb). To investigate the horizontal transfer of these plasmids between the animals, two pairs of E. coli isolates from pig farms 1 and 3 were selected for WGS analysis. Three of the isolates (EcoP3-1, EcoC2-1 from pigs, and Eco1266-6 from a rat) belonged to clonal complex 10 (CC10), while the other rat isolate (Eco1284-6) belonged to CC398 (ST398). Eco1266-6 (rat) and EcoC2-1 (pig) from cohabiting animals in pig farm 1 carried IncX4 plasmids with the mcr-1.1 variant. The plasmid sequences were almost identical (99.98% identity), both carrying the mcr-1.1/pap2 segment. pEcoC2-1 had a complete ISVsa5 insertion sequence upstream of the mcr-1 gene. Eco1284-6 (rat) and EcoP3-1 (pig) from pig farm 3 carried IncI2 plasmids with different allelic variants of mcr-1 (mcr-1.5 and mcr-1.1). CONCLUSIONS: E. coli isolates from cohabiting rats and pigs were genetically distinct, but one pair of isolates had very similar IncX4 plasmids, suggesting the potential for horizontal spread of plasmids carrying mcr genes. These findings suggest a threat of resistant E. coli spreading between cohabiting animals and into the environment. This underscores the importance of conducting integrated One-Health studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".