Pemanfaatan Pekarangan Untuk Ketahanan Pangan Keluarga Pada Kelompok Wanita Tani Di Desa Alasangker
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desa Alasangker mempunyai potensi yang besar dalam pengembangan pertanian, baik di areal lahan maupun pada areal pekarangan. Berdasarkan potensi tersebut, pemerintah desa berkeinginan untuk memanfaatkan lahan tersebut melalui program P2L untuk ketahanan pangan dengan ujung tombak kegiatan adalah Kelompok Wanita Tani (KWT) Sari Rejeki. Pemerintah desa, selanjutnya melalui kerjasama dengan Dinas Ketahanan Pangan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Buleleng dan Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Panji Sakti melaksanakan penyuluhan dan pelatihan kepada KWT Sari Rejeki. Tujuan dari kegiatan ini adalah untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan dan kesadaran masyarakat dalam melakukan budidaya tanaman di lahan pekarangan sebagai sumber ketahanan pangan keluarga. Berdasarkan hasil kegiatan disimpulkan bahwa anggota KWT secara umum telah memahami teknis budidaya tanaman di pekarangan, namun masih perlu peningkatan pengetahuan terkait pengendalian serangan hama dan penyakit serta pemanfaatan irigasi yang efektif. Sehingga melalui kegiatan penyuluhan dan pelatihan yang dilakukan ketarampilan anggotan kelompok telah semakin meningkat dan selanjutnya perlu dilakukan monitoring dan evaluasi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".