Mengatasi Quarter Life Crisis dan Meningkatkan Potensi Diri Melalui Metode Self-Healing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Quarter Life Crisis (QLC) is a phenomenon often experienced by teenagers in their early 20s. It can cause anxiety, confusion, and a sense of loss of direction in life. Therefore, it is important to equip adolescents with knowledge and skills that can help them deal with QLC and increase their potential. The purpose of this community service is to introduce QLC to 11th grade students of SMAN 13 Bandar Lampung and equip them with self-healing methods to increase their potential. The methods used in this activity were lectures, discussions, and self-healing practices. The results showed that after participating in this activity, students had a better understanding of QLC and could identify its signs. In addition, students were also able to apply self-healing methods to increase their potential. In conclusion, this community service activity provided significant benefits for 11th grade students at SMAN 13 Bandar Lampung. Students become more prepared to face QLC and have higher self-confidence to develop their potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".