MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409409562 · doi:10.26685/urncst.789

Low-Cost Fine-Tuning of Data-Efficient Image Transformers on Knee X-Ray Imaging for Osteoarthritis Detection

2025· article· en· W4409409562 on OpenAlexafffund
Shamil Canbolat, Kevin Sogoli

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfrared Thermography in Medicine
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsOsteoarthritisTransformerComputer scienceComputer visionMedicineArtificial intelligenceEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltagePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Technological advancements in artificial intelligence within the field of medicine, specifically skeletal pathology, have witnessed exponential growth in recent years. Researchers have trained deep learning models on radiographs to improve the detection of diseases. There is precedence for low data training on musculoskeletal imaging tasks, and “specialized” medical imaging-related tasks in general have exhibited high performance on low amounts of data. Thus, the Data-efficient Image Transformer (DeiT) model has potential to surpass conventional convolutional models in detecting musculoskeletal diseases due to its ability to extract relevant features with scarce data. Methods: This study utilizes a DeiT model pre-trained on ImageNet 2012. The model was fine-tuned on labelled knee X-rays of patients with and without osteoarthritis using the PyTorch library. Fine-tuning and testing were done on a Google Colab notebook using a T4 GPU. A hyperparameter sweep cycling through different dropout values, optimizers, and image input sizes was tested. Results were recorded using multiple accuracy metrics. Results: The DeiT-B 384 model with unspecified dropout had the highest scores out of all the model variations. The DeiT’s composite performance in diagnosing knee osteoarthritis exceeded that of convolutional models. Fine-tuning resulted in accuracies within the standard established by current literature for the 384 model, but not for the 224 model. This suggests that larger input models trained on lower quality images performed better than smaller input models trained on higher quality images. Implications: Fine-tuning can be an alternative to training from scratch for medical imaging. Future studies should expand their scope by taking additional patient details into account to increase diagnostic accuracy and provide local and individualized patient care. The absence of these variables in our model’s training potentially limited its accuracy. Current real-time diagnostic errors are less than even the best performing computer vision models, so accuracy must significantly improve before there is incentive to adopt these methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicInfrared Thermography in MedicineFrench-language works237,207