A Western-Style Diet Influences Ingestive Behavior and Glycemic Control in a Rat Model of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery results in weight reduction and decreased energy intake and can ameliorate type 2 diabetes. These beneficial effects are usually attributed to changes in hunger and satiety and relatively rapid improvements in glycemic control, but these effects may depend on dietary adherence. The aim of this study is to investigate the relatively early effects of RYGB surgery on weight reduction (by focusing on eating patterns) and glycemic control in rats subjected to a healthy maintenance diet or an unhealthy Western-style diet. Methods: Rats were fed a high-fat diet with added sucrose (HF/S) or a low-fat (LF) diet. Body weight, high-resolution tracking of meal-related parameters, and glucose regulation after overnight fasting and during a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT; 2 mL sweet/condensed milk) were measured before and after RYGB (RYGB+) or sham surgery (RYGB−). Results: HF/S feeding led to an increased body weight just before RYGB surgery, but it also caused enhanced weight loss following RYGB, which led to similar body weights in the HF/S and LF diet groups twenty-four days post-operatively. RYGB surgery and diet dependently and independently influenced meal-related parameter outcomes, where both RYGB+ and HF/S feeding resulted in shorter meal duration (p < 0.01), higher ingestion rates (p < 0.001), and increased satiety ratio (p < 0.05), especially in the HF/S diet group subjected to RYGB. While RYGB surgery generally improved baseline glycemic parameters including HOMA-IR (p < 0.01), it often interacted with diet to affect MMTT-induced hyperglycemia (p < 0.05), beta-cell sensitivity (p < 0.01), and the insulinogenic index (p < 0.01), with the LF rats overall maintaining better glycemic control than the HF/S-fed rats. Conclusions: This study shows the importance of controlling diet after RYGB surgery, as diet type significantly influences ingestive behavior, post-prandial glucose regulation, beta-cell sensitivity, and glucose tolerance after RYGB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".