MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409410323 · doi:10.1007/s40121-025-01151-0

Indirect Comparison of PCV20 Immunogenicity with PCV10 in Pediatric 3 + 1 and 2 + 1 Schedules

2025· article· en· W4409410323 on OpenAlexaff
Eileen M. Dunne, Valda A. Struwig, Johnna Perdrizet, Noor Tamimi, Kyla Hayford, Luis Jódar, Bradford D Gessner, Christian Theilacker

Bibliographic record

VenueInfectious Diseases and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsPfizer (Canada)
FundersPfizer
KeywordsImmunogenicityMedicinePediatricsImmunologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) was licensed for prevention of pneumococcal disease in infants and children on the basis of immunogenicity compared with PCV13. We aimed to evaluate PCV20 immunogenicity compared with PCV10 (Synflorix; PhiD-CV) because both vaccines demonstrated lower immunogenicity than PCV13. Nevertheless, PCV10 was highly effective against vaccine-serotype pneumococcal disease in post-licensure studies. Since no study has directly compared PCV20 versus PCV10, we conducted an indirect comparison. METHODS: We conducted indirect comparisons for PCV20 versus PCV10 using data from published randomized control trials that directly compared these vaccines with PCV13 in 3 + 1 or 2 + 1 schedules. Serotype-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G concentrations and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) were assessed post-booster dose and post-primary series. First, geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were obtained for shared serotypes for each direct comparison against PCV13; we conducted a meta-analysis to generate pooled GMRs if data from multiple trials were available. Next, we indirectly compared relative GMRs of PCV20 versus PCV10 using PCV13 as the common comparator. In this descriptive analysis, GMRs > 1 favored PCV20 and GMR < 1 favored PCV10. RESULTS: Meta-analyses of PCV10 versus PCV13 data found that PCV10 was less immunogenic for most of the ten shared serotypes. When indirectly compared via PCV13, the relative immunogenicity of PCV20 versus PCV10 varied by serotype. Overall, IgG responses for the ten shared serotypes were similar for both 3 + 1 and 2 + 1 schedules, both post-primary series and post-booster dose. GMRs for both IgG and OPA were close to the line of equivalence, or spread between favoring PCV20 or PCV10. CONCLUSIONS: The comparable immunogenicity of PCV20 versus PCV10 in 2 + 1 and 3 + 1 schedules suggests that PCV20 will have similar effectiveness for the ten serotypes included in both vaccines, including for direct protection during infancy and toddler age, while also expanding serotype coverage. Effectiveness for PCV20 needs to be confirmed in post-marketing studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfectious Diseases and TherapySame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207