MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409410468 · doi:10.12927/cjnl.2025.27554

Education for Registered Nurses in Primary Care: Current and Future Trends

2025· review· en· W4409410468 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Julia Lukewich, Sophia Myles, Dana Ryan, Suzanne Braithwaite, Marie-Ève Poitras, Deanne Curnew, Maria Mathews

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing leadership · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversité de SherbrookeTrent UniversityNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health ResearchMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary careNursingCurrent (fluid)PsychologyMedical educationMedicineFamily medicineEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Registered nurses (RNs) require specific preparation to fulfill the unique roles of working in primary care in Canada; however, RN education lacks primary care-specific content. This paper reviews RN education related to primary care in Canada by outlining opportunities and challenges. Gaps in primary care-specific education within undergraduate programs and at the post-licensure level highlight the need for integrating primary care, including interprofessional collaboration, into curricula throughout the education and training pipeline. Establishing partnerships across education, practice and policy spheres is critical to adapting RN education to meet the needs of Canada's primary care workforce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.461
GPT teacher head0.549
Teacher spread0.087 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing leadershipSame topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207