MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409411472 · doi:10.1007/s00338-025-02657-2

High-resolution aerial imagery reveals that the distribution and arrangement of Acropora palmata patches determine their resistance to hurricane impacts

2025· article· en· W4409411472 on OpenAlex
Clarisa de Hoyos-Jiménez, Lara Virginia Birkart, Eduardo Navarro-Espinoza, Lorenzo Álvarez‐Filip

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCoral Reefs · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGlobal Affairs CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsAcroporaCoralResistance (ecology)Hurricane katrinaAerial imageryHigh resolutionGeologyOceanographyGeographyBiologyEnvironmental scienceEcologyRemote sensingNatural disaster

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Acropora palmata is the species that contributes the most to the structural complexity of Caribbean reefs. Information concerning the complexity of its populations at the landscape level is relevant to determine how the reef system responds to disturbances, such as cyclonic events. This study examines the repercussions of hurricanes Gamma and Delta (2020) on the patches of A. palmata in Limones reef, one of the best-preserved reefs in the Caribbean. Two orthomosaics were generated using programmed drone flights, one before and one after the passage of both hurricanes. Visually identified polygon files representing A. palmata patches were delineated in both orthomosaics. Regression models were used to analyze the influence of spatial characteristics of those patches, measured through landscape ecology indices, on the probability of patch permanence and, for those patches that remained, the remaining area. Our results show that the A. palmata population suffered a total loss of 25% due to hurricanes. More compact and complex patches at shallower depths exhibited a higher persistence probability. Furthermore, the spatial location of the patches in relation to each other (proximity and size of their neighbors) did not significantly affect the permanence probability. The metrics used were not a good indicator of the area loss of the patches that remained. Here, the damages suffered could mainly be explained by the reef zone, which we attribute to the phenotypic plasticity of A. palmata colonies in high-energy zones, affecting growth characteristics that allow them to better withstand the impact of hurricanes. Overall, we show that using landscape indices to understand the drivers of change in the spatial structure of reefs is an effective method to evaluate and even predict the modifications suffered after disturbance events, information that could be readily available for management and conservation strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it