ICE BINDING PROTEIN ACTIVITY IS COMMON AMONG TEMPERATE PACIFIC INTERTIDAL INVERTEBRATES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intertidal invertebrates often adopt freeze tolerance as a strategy to survive winter low tides, but the physiological mechanisms by which intertidal species survive freezing are not well understood. Ice binding proteins (IBPs) may play an important role, but their occurrence throughout the intertidal zone worldwide is not well-catalogued. Here we survey species in the intertidal zone of Vancouver, BC to assess IBP activities and the possible role they play in freeze tolerance. We conducted targeted assays in multiple intertidal species to measure three distinct activities of IBPs: ice nucleation, ice recrystallization inhibition, and thermal hysteresis. We also exposed intertidal species to a cold exposure mimicking a freezing event in the intertidal and measured survival post-exposure. We found that IBP activity was widespread across intertidal species, and that species with the highest degree of freeze tolerance also display ice nucleating activity attributable to proteins. We also found that species that live in the high intertidal appear to show more IBP activity than species that live lower in the intertidal. This work significantly increases the number of known species containing IBPs and provides a framework for sampling new species for IBP activity in the intertidal and elsewhere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".