MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409418988 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113465

Comparison of deep and shallow one-class classifiers for detecting invasive Prosopis trees in Kenya from airborne hyperspectral data

2025· article· en· W4409418988 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ilja Vuorinne, Janne Heiskanen, Zhaozhi Luo, Ian Ocholla, Rose Kihungu, Petri Pellikka

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Indicators · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDate Palm Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Commission for Science, Technology and InnovationChina Scholarship CouncilEuropean CommissionAlfred Kordelinin SäätiöESSA Pharma
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingProsopisInvasive speciesRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceGeographyEcologyForestryAgroforestryArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• ITreeDet (2D CNN) exhibited the best performance among several one-class classifiers (F1 = 0.81). • The key wavelength regions were blue and green, and to some degree red and red-edge. • The results emphasise the importance of classifier selection in invasive species mapping. Prosopis spp. are globally widespread woody invasive plants that negatively impact biodiversity and rural livelihoods. Accurate distribution information is essential for understanding their ecological consequences and for effective conservation and land management. In this study, we evaluated the suitability of airborne hyperspectral data in the visible and near-infrared (VNIR) range for pixel-level mapping of Prosopis trees at the beginning of the dry season in Kenya. For the mapping, we compared the performance of five one-class classifiers, a type of weakly supervised method trained solely using labels for the target class. The classifiers compared were Biased Support Vector Machine (BSVM), Maximum Entropy (Maxent), Boosted Regression Tree (BRT), ITreeDet (with experiments using both 2D and 3D convolutional neural networks [CNNs]), and HOneCls (a 2D fully convolutional neural network). The models were trained using observations of 120 Prosopis trees across the study area, corresponding to 2561 pixels, along with 10,000 unlabeled tree pixels. Testing was done using data from five 1 ha study plots, totalling 14,637 tree pixels. To analyse feature importance we used a model-agnostic permutation approach. F1-score was highest for ITreeDet with 2D CNN (0.81), followed by MaxEnt (0.73), HOneCls (0.71), BSVM (0.68), and BRT (0.65). The critical hyperspectral features were consistent across the models and primarily in the blue and green region, with some importance in the red and red-edge region, while near-infrared showed low importance. The results highlight the effectiveness of VNIR hyperspectral data and one-class classification for mapping Prosopis trees in Kenya. The demonstrated methodology is a promising tool for high-resolution mapping of Prosopis trees, supporting ecosystem restoration and conservation efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcological IndicatorsSame topicDate Palm Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207