Adapting Basic On-Road Data to the Heavy Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Schedule for Guiding the Electrification of Long-Haul Truck Transport
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div>Heavy heavy-duty diesel truck (HHDDT) drive cycles for long-haul transport trucks were developed over 20 years ago and have a renewed relevance for performance assessment and technical forecasting for transport electrification. In this study, a model was constructed from sparse data recorded from the real-life on-road activity of a small fleet of class 8 trucks by fitting them into separate driving-type segments constituting the complete HHDDT drive cycle. Detailed 1-s resolution truck fleet raw data were also available for assessing the drive cycle model.</div> <div>Numerical simulations were conducted to assess the model for trucks powered by both 1.0 MW charging and 300 kW-level e-Highway, accounting for elevation and seasonally varying climate conditions along the Windsor–Quebec City corridor in Canada. The modeling approach was able to estimate highway cruising speeds, energy efficiencies, and battery pack lifetimes normally within 2% of values determined using the detailed high-resolution on-road raw data.</div> <div>HHDDT drive cycles derived from sparse data can be considered fully satisfactory for long-haul truck simulations for electrification planning. Further, it was shown that the virtual electric truck as specified here can perform the same duty cycle as diesel trucks are currently doing in the same amount of time on e-Hwys, and requiring less an hour per day additional time for the 1.0 MW charger modality.</div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".