MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409421713 · doi:10.1080/01621459.2025.2450191

Our Mission in Action: Past, Present, and Future

2025· article· en· W4409421713 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dionne Price

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Farm Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Food and Drug Administration
KeywordsAction (physics)AeronauticsComputer scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driven by our mission, we have advanced science for the public good. Our history is rich in theory, methodology, and applications that are instrumental in solving real-world problems. Our reach is boundless, and our impact is undeniable in diverse areas, including engineering, economics, the environment, genetics, public health, and health policy. As the data landscape continues to evolve, our leadership, expertise and knowledge will be essential to meet the global challenges of the future. We must boldly embody our mission of promoting the practice and profession of statistics. In this talk, I will highlight our mission in action as we strive to be a community that uses statistical thinking to drive discovery and inform decisions. This article summarizes the 2023 presidential speech given at the JSM in Toronto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Statistical AssociationSame topicAgriculture and Farm SafetyFrench-language works237,207