MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409423124 · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2025.133020

A sustainable chromium and vanadium extraction and separation process from high-chromium vanadium slag via synchronous roasting and asynchronous leaching

2025· article· en· W4409423124 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Zhao, Zhongwei Zhao, Yingpeng Xu, Ziming Cao, Weilun Li, Tianyu Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueSeparation and Purification Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsVanadiumRoastingChromiumLeaching (pedology)MetallurgyMaterials scienceNon-blocking I/OSlag (welding)ChemistryEnvironmental scienceCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Achieves comprehensive recovery of HCVS and separation of V and Cr. • SRAL approach simplifies V and Cr extraction into one process. • Mixed reagents combine sodium salt and calcium methods, avoiding their drawbacks. • Thermodynamic analysis confirms the feasibility and mechanism of the new method. • The method is energy-efficient, simple, quick, and sustainable for industrial use. Vanadium and chromium are critical industrial resources, with approximately 88% of global vanadium production originating from vanadium slag. Due to their similar chemical properties, chromium tends to concentrate in vanadium slag during the smelting process. This issue is especially pronounced in high-chromium vanadium slag (HCVS), where the chromium content is significantly elevated, presenting substantial challenges for the recovery and separation of vanadium and chromium. Traditional sodium salt and calcium-based roasting methods, while effective for conventional vanadium slag, are not directly applicable to HCVS due to the concerns on separation difficulties, energy consumption, and operational complexity. To address these challenges, this study introduces a synchronous roasting and asynchronous leaching (SRAL) process, incorporating a strategy for preferential chromium extraction, to achieve efficient recovery and separation of vanadium and chromium. The process employs a binary mixture of calcium oxide and sodium carbonate for roasting, which transforms vanadium into water-insoluble calcium vanadates and chromium into water-soluble sodium chromates simultaneously, followed by chromium extraction through water leaching and vanadium extraction via ammonium bicarbonate solution leaching. The experiment indicates that the maximum leaching efficiencies achieved in this study are as follows: the water leaching efficiency of vanadium is 8.43%, the ammonium bicarbonate leaching efficiency is 86.52%, resulting in a total leaching efficiency of 94.95%. For chromium, the water leaching efficiency is 84.23%, the ammonium bicarbonate leaching efficiency is 5.42%, leading to a total leaching efficiency of 89.65%. Thermodynamic analysis and experimental validation demonstrate the feasibility of the method from both theoretical and practical perspectives, offering a more efficient and sustainable approach for the recovery and utilization of HCVS and ensuring the sustainability of vanadium and chromium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeparation and Purification TechnologySame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207