Design and commissioning of a high-temperature electrochemical cell for hard X-ray <i>in operando</i> studies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solid oxide cells (SOCs) are a promising technology that can both utilize fuel efficiently in fuel cell mode (SOFC) and store energy as fuel in electrolysis mode (SOEC). Of particular interest is the ability to use clean and renewable energy to both electrolyze water to make hydrogen fuel, and convert CO 2 produced during combustion into valuable products such as syngas (H 2 + CO). As a potential cornerstone of a closed-loop sustainable energy system, we must advance our understanding of the electrocatalysts incorporated in SOCs to accelerate the energy transition. Operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is a proven tool for the element-specific characterization of low-temperature electrochemical cells, since it provides local structural and chemical information about the catalyst. However, operando techniques are challenging to apply to SOC studies because their operating conditions, including high-temperature operation, are very demanding. Here, we present an experimental apparatus designed to perform XAS on working electrochemical cells under realistic operating conditions. This cell design is adaptable to any beamline and can be configured to probe both fuel and air electrodes in either the fuel cell or electrolysis cell mode. We present data from commissioning at the SXRMB beamline, demonstrating the ability to obtain XAS and electrochemical measurements from cells at high temperatures. This apparatus has the potential to reveal new insights about SOC reaction mechanisms, leading to more directed design of efficient catalysts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it