MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409428036 · doi:10.56885/310523tegjqu

A Mission With A Vision: The Canadian Diabetic Foot Ulcer Policy Roundtable

2025· article· en· W4409428036 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahtisham Younas, Kathleen Stevens

Bibliographic record

VenueLimb Preservation Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiabetic foot ulcerDiabetic footFoot (prosody)MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPolitical scienceDiabetes mellitusPhilosophyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wounds Canada partnered with Memorial University and the Limb Preservation Alliance to host the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Policy Roundtable at the Wounds Canada National Conference on October 16, 2024, in London, Ontario. The roundtable brought key experts together to define strategies for each of the key policy areas in the prevention and management of diabetic foot ulcers towards the goal of improving quality of life for all Canadians and around the world. This article reports on some of the key discussion points and recommendations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimb Preservation JournalSame topicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207