MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409430518 · doi:10.1177/00302228251334710

Migratory Suicide in the Province of Quebec, Canada (1890–1940): The Importance of Movement and the Post-Death Cost of Exclusion

2025· article· en· W4409430518 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Christopher Greco, Patrice Corriveau

Bibliographic record

VenueOMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaNipissing University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeographyTourismSuicide preventionDemographyCriminologyPoison controlSociologyMedicineEnvironmental healthArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While suicide tourism or the death of persons who end their life while 'out of town' has been explored, there are no works that focus specifically on migratory suicide-that is, on persons ending their life without assistance after travelling, to a place where they are (1) not residents and (2) have no communal ties, for the purpose of doing so. We here explore migratory suicide's occurrence and the lives ended as a result in the province of Quebec, Canada, during the years 1890-1940. The historical tendency of Quebec coroners to attribute suicides to impermanent forms of mental deterioration is found to be less pronounced in instances of migratory suicide, though the number of related farewell letters exceeded the provincial norm. The importance of movement and conditions of exclusion in facilitating death by suicide and influencing post-death protections are emphasized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOMEGA - Journal of Death and DyingSame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207