Challenging the “Puritan Dread of the Theatre”: The Forgotten Legacy of Henry Arthur Jones’s <i>Saints and Sinners</i> (1884)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Henry Arthur Jones’s 1884 melodrama Saints and Sinners stretched the boundaries of theatrical permissibility with its novel portrayals of religious practitioners and contemporary religious life, establishing precedents upon which later, better-known plays would expand. Jones’s drama tested the bounds of official religious censorship from the Lord Chamberlain’s Office, and its production served as a key demonstration that the audience’s “Puritan dread of the theatre” – which many playwrights and critics of the age felt was the true limiting factor in the development of British drama – was declining. A close reading of the play’s religious portrayals and an examination of the archival record demonstrates that the laxity with which Jones’s play was treated by the Lord Chamberlain’s Office was exceptional and not at all in line with other plays of the era, thus setting new censorial norms that other dramatists would further stretch. Attending to the ways in which Saints and Sinners used pioneering religious discourses to test the Lord Chamberlain’s and the audience’s limits provides a more thorough understanding of the forces that transformed British theatre at the end of the nineteenth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".