Censorship Public and Censorship Private: Authority, Authenticity, and Acceptability in the Early Production History of Brian Friel’s <i>Philadelphia, Here I Come!</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The early production history of Brian Friel’s breakout play, Philadelphia, Here I Come! (1964), is, in many respects, a story of public and private censorship. By recovering that history through original archival research, I bring into focus a revealing snapshot of the artistic concerns and professional anxieties of an emerging playwright on the eve of his rise to international prominence. Friel’s experience of the dying days of UK stage censorship, at a time when the partial decriminalization of sex between men was being debated in the Houses of Parliament, offers rare insight into the relationship between the play’s production history, the intersectional politics of acceptability, and the queer history of these islands. Drawing on material from the Brian Friel Papers (National Library of Ireland) and the Lord Chamberlain’s Plays and Correspondence (British Library), this article sheds new light on a turning point in Friel’s career at a time when the politics of queer representation were also on the threshold of significant change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".