MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409435457 · doi:10.3390/ijms26083636

Genetic Analysis of Choroideremia-Related Rab Escort Proteins

2025· article· en· W4409435457 on OpenAlexaff
Zhuo Xing, Fuguo Wu, Eduardo Cortes Gomez, Annie Pao, Lingqiu Gao, A. R. Douglas, Yichen Li, Joseph A. Spernyak, G. William Wong, Prashant Kumar Singh, Jianmin Wang, Song Liu, Yasmin Thanavala, Ian M. MacDonald, Xiuqian Mu, Y. Eugene Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Eye InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsChoroideremiaBiologyRetinal degenerationRetinitis pigmentosaMutantGeneticsPhenotypeRetinalRabCell biologyGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

gene, which encodes Rab escort protein 1 (REP-1). In humans and mice, the Rab escort protein (REP) family consists of two members, REP-1 and REP-2, with REP-2 hypothesized to compensate for REP-1 deficiency in tissues outside the eye in choroideremia. In this study, we conducted a systematic mutational analysis of the mouse orthologs of REP-1 and REP-2. Blood analyses revealed metabolic abnormalities in the mutant mice deficient for REP-1, resembling the systemic metabolic disturbances observed in individuals with choroideremia, such as altered lipid and hemoglobin metabolism. We also observed an elevation in systemic inflammatory biomarkers in these mutant mice. Interestingly, these systemic abnormalities emerged before retinal degeneration became detectable in REP-1-deficient mice. Transcriptomic analysis of retinas isolated from REP-1 deficient mice revealed enrichment of proinflammatory signaling pathways. These results suggest important similarities between choroideremia and some forms of retinitis pigmentosa. While engineered loss of REP-2 alone caused no detectable phenotypic changes, dual deficiency in REP-1 and REP-2 resulted in lethality under both in vivo and in vitro conditions. Our findings offer novel insights into REPs and deepen our understanding of choroideremia, which may contribute to the development of new treatments for this genetic condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular SciencesSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207