An Induced Seismicity Indicator Using Accumulated Microearthquakes’ Frictional Energy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Induced seismicity resulting from mining activities is one of the major challenges faced by the mining industry. Although such events have been documented for over a century in countries with extensive mining traditions, such as Canada, Australia, and Chile, their impact has intensified over time. This increase is primarily attributed to the greater extraction depths, where elevated stress levels and environmental conditions heighten the likelihood of rockburst occurrences. Seismic events within mines lead to significant human casualties and substantial infrastructure damage, necessitating the implementation of various safety protocols. Among these, seismic indicators are employed to identify periods when high-magnitude seismic events are most likely to occur through the analysis of parameters such as magnitude, energy, time, and decay rate. In this context, the present study aims to utilize the accumulated frictional energy generated by microearthquakes within the Bobrek mine, Poland, as a seismic indicator (variation of frictional energy in time), establishing its correlation with the occurrence of high-magnitude seismic events exceeding the background activity. Thousands of combinations of seismic parameters were tested to maximize the performance of this frictional energy-based indicator, parameters such as moment magnitude, frictional energy, and rock properties. The optimal set of parameters was determined using the Piece Skill Score (PSS) and subsequently applied to the Accumulated Frictional Heat (AFH) methodology. According to the results, the seismic indicator forecasts 86.6% of events with magnitudes Mw ≥ 2.3, with an average forecasting time of 9.76 h, indicating that, on average, these events can be anticipated approximately 10 h before their occurrence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".