MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409438646 · doi:10.1002/acr.25550

Understanding Contributors of Resilience in Youth With Childhood‐Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Through a Socioecological Lens: A Mixed‐Methods Study

2025· article· en· W4409438646 on OpenAlexaffabout
Isabella Zaffino, Louise Boulard, Joanna Law, Asha Jeyanathan, Lawrence Ng, Sandra Williams‐Reid, Angela Cortes, Ashley Danguecan, Deborah M. Levy, Linda T. Hiraki, Andrea Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis Care & Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids Foundation
FundersLupus Research AllianceU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsThematic analysisPsychological resilienceMental healthMedicineSocial supportHealth literacyAdverse Childhood ExperiencesDiseasePsychologyMental health literacySystemic lupus erythematosusAnxietyClinical psychologyGerontologyHealth careQualitative researchPsychiatryMental illnessSociologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify themes contributing to resilience in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE), distinguish between profiles of resilience, and examine how they relate to underlying themes and patient characteristics. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study of 21 patients with cSLE aged 11 to 19 years at a Canadian tertiary care center from October 2022 to July 2024. We purposively sampled patients belonging to ethnically and culturally diverse backgrounds to complete semistructured interviews. We qualitatively defined features of resilience and distinguished profiles of low versus high socioecological resilience according to patient median on the Child and Youth Resilience Measure-Revised (CYRM-R). Profiles were then related to sociodemographic (eg, adverse childhood experiences, health literacy), disease features (eg, age at diagnosis, disease duration), and patient-reported outcomes (eg, anxiety and depressive symptoms). RESULTS: Factors contributing to resilience were grouped into five themes: familial environment, social support beyond family, health services and information, life with SLE, and sense of self. Cultural influences were reported to impact several themes. Patients with high resilience (scores above 73 on CYRM-R) reported more facilitators in each thematic area, whereas patients with low resilience experienced more challenges in these areas, in addition to greater number of adverse childhood experiences, lower health literacy, earlier age at diagnosis, longer disease duration and poorer mental health. CONCLUSION: Findings support a dynamic model of resilience, shaped by a combination of sociodemographic, disease, personal, cultural and social factors. This improved understanding of resilience may help direct comprehensive care for youth with cSLE and guide targeted interventions for youth at risk of poor outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis Care & Research→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→