Characterization and Classification of Low-Resolution Satellites with Electro-Optical Fiducial Markers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we demonstrate the efficacy of identifying low-Earth-orbit and geosynchronous-Earth-orbit satellites with an electro-optical fiducial marker in a complex mission environment. Our focus is on space-based observations, where the observing satellite sensors produce low-resolution or unresolved images. To demonstrate this novel approach, we will use the digital mission engineering software tool Ansys Systems Tool Kit and its Electro-Optical Infrared capability to model missions, vary sensor properties, modify electro-optical fiducial markers on the satellite of interest, and generate synthetic sensor imagery data to train and evaluate support vector machine and convolutional neural network classifiers. We will also investigate how feature selection and machine-learning model performance is impacted using low-resolution/unresolved images and how well our models can distinguish the satellite with the electro-optical fiducial markers from the bloblike shapes. The approach discussed here will provide a generalized framework for configuring systems and for object identification and characterization. The primary application in this work is for space situational awareness and space domain awareness; however, the workflows can also be applied to object identification in other domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it