Generative adversarial network approach for predicting tensile behavior and failure pattern of fiber-reinforced cementitious matrices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fiber-reinforced cementitious matrices (FRCM) are a sustainable solution for rehabilitating aging civil infrastructure. Yet, there is a lack of consistent models for predicting the tensile strength, ultimate strain, and failure pattern of FRCM coupons, posing hurdles against effective design and wider applications. The present study resolves this gap by coining a novel machine learning (ML) framework based on conditional tabular generative adversarial network (CTGAN) to estimate the tensile strength, ultimate strain, and failure patterns of FRCM coupons. Firstly, an extensive dataset of FRCM coupons considering tensile strength, ultimate strain, and failure patterns was collected from relevant publications. CTGAN was then employed to generate synthetic data, thus alleviating the problem of limited experimental data. A training subset encompassing 70 % of the collected data was used for synthetic data generation using CTGAN. The augmented dataset was used to develop ML models to prognosticate the tensile behavior of FRCM coupons. Results show that the synthetic dataset offers credibility enabling the development of ML models with higher prediction accuracy in estimating the tensile behavior of FRCM coupons compared to models trained with real datasets. Among the developed models trained with synthetic data, eXtreme gradient boosting showed the highest prediction accuracy, achieving testing R 2 and MAE values of 0.9690 and 84.50 MPa, respectively, for the tensile strength of FRCM coupons. SHAP feature importance analysis identified fiber density, width of FRCM coupons, thickness of fabric, and length of FRCM coupons as the most influential parameters affecting tensile strength and ultimate strain, conforming to domain knowledge in the open literature. • Novel conditional tabular generative adversarial network generated reliable synthetic data on FRCM tensile behavior. • Machine learning models trained on synthetic data yield superior accuracy to models trained on limited experimental data. • eXtreme gradient boosting was the most accurate in predicting tensile behavior and failure patterns. • Accurate estimation of FRCM’s coupon tensile behavior enables accurate FRCM design in structural rehabilitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".