MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Generative adversarial network approach for predicting tensile behavior and failure pattern of fiber-reinforced cementitious matrices

2025· article· en· W4409446843 on OpenAlexaff
Aman Kumar, Afshin Marani, Moncef L. Nehdi

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative concrete reinforcement materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphArup Group (Canada)McMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltimate tensile strengthStructural engineeringAdversarial systemCementitiousGenerative grammarFiberMaterials scienceComposite materialComputer scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiber-reinforced cementitious matrices (FRCM) are a sustainable solution for rehabilitating aging civil infrastructure. Yet, there is a lack of consistent models for predicting the tensile strength, ultimate strain, and failure pattern of FRCM coupons, posing hurdles against effective design and wider applications. The present study resolves this gap by coining a novel machine learning (ML) framework based on conditional tabular generative adversarial network (CTGAN) to estimate the tensile strength, ultimate strain, and failure patterns of FRCM coupons. Firstly, an extensive dataset of FRCM coupons considering tensile strength, ultimate strain, and failure patterns was collected from relevant publications. CTGAN was then employed to generate synthetic data, thus alleviating the problem of limited experimental data. A training subset encompassing 70 % of the collected data was used for synthetic data generation using CTGAN. The augmented dataset was used to develop ML models to prognosticate the tensile behavior of FRCM coupons. Results show that the synthetic dataset offers credibility enabling the development of ML models with higher prediction accuracy in estimating the tensile behavior of FRCM coupons compared to models trained with real datasets. Among the developed models trained with synthetic data, eXtreme gradient boosting showed the highest prediction accuracy, achieving testing R 2 and MAE values of 0.9690 and 84.50 MPa, respectively, for the tensile strength of FRCM coupons. SHAP feature importance analysis identified fiber density, width of FRCM coupons, thickness of fabric, and length of FRCM coupons as the most influential parameters affecting tensile strength and ultimate strain, conforming to domain knowledge in the open literature. • Novel conditional tabular generative adversarial network generated reliable synthetic data on FRCM tensile behavior. • Machine learning models trained on synthetic data yield superior accuracy to models trained on limited experimental data. • eXtreme gradient boosting was the most accurate in predicting tensile behavior and failure patterns. • Accurate estimation of FRCM’s coupon tensile behavior enables accurate FRCM design in structural rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering StructuresSame topicInnovative concrete reinforcement materialsFrench-language works237,207