MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Assessing Pan-Canada wildfire susceptibility by integrating satellite data with novel hybrid deep learning and black widow optimizer algorithms

2025· article· en· W4409448269 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Khabat Khosravi, Ashkan Mosallanejad, Sayed M. Bateni, Dongkyun Kim, Changhyun Jun, Ali Reza Shahvaran, Aitazaz A. Farooque, Mumtaz Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersKorea Environmental Industry and Technology InstituteGouvernement de l'Île-du-Prince-ÉdouardNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Prince Edward IslandAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyDepartment of Energy, Environment and Climate ActionNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of Environment
KeywordsSatelliteDeep learningAlgorithmComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMeteorologyRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceMachine learningGeographyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In light of the rising frequency of severe wildfires and their widespread socio-ecological impacts, it is essential to develop cost-effective and reliable methods for accurately predicting and mapping wildfire occurrences. This study aimed to develop several novel deep-learning models to determine the probability of wildfire occurrence on a national scale in Canada by integrating remote sensing data, deep learning, and metaheuristic algorithms. In the present study, novel standalone long short-term memory (LSTM), recurrent neural network (RNN), bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), and bidirectional RNN (BiRNN) models were developed, and these were hybridized with a black widow optimizer (BWO). To train and test the models, 4240 historical (2014-2023) large wildfire locations were collected across Canada. Fourteen wildfire-related predictors were used to map wildfire susceptibility, with the Gini coefficient determining each predictor's importance in wildfire occurrence. Finally, the developed models were evaluated and tested using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and other statistical error metrics. During the testing stage, the hybrid BiLSTM-BWO model outperformed the other models (AUC = 0.9686), followed by RNN-BWO (AUC = 0.9683), LSTM-BWO (AUC = 0.9672), BiRNN-BWO (AUC = 0.9643), BiLSTM (AUC = 0.9420), LSTM (AUC = 0.9367), BiRNN (AUC = 0.9247) and RNN (AUC = 0.8737). Based on the BiLSTM-BWO model, 19.7 %, 42.6 %, 13.4 %, 14.5 %, and 9.8 % of Canada was classified as having very low, low, moderate, high, and very high susceptibility to future wildfires, respectively. Saskatchewan, Manitoba, British Columbia and Alberta were among the provinces with large areas of very high susceptibility to wildfires, while Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador from Atlantic Canada had the lowest probability of wildfire occurrence. According to the Gini coefficient, windspeed, land use and land cover, precipitation, specific humidity and maximum temperature had the strongest impact on wildfire susceptibility across Canada. This study highlights the effectiveness of the developed hybrid models in wildfire prediction and their potential to improve land management, wildfire prevention, and mitigation strategies in Canada's future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total Environment→Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→