MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409451884 · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.04.150

Determination and verification of Johnson-Cook dynamic constitutive model for surface-modified layer of carburized 18CrNiMo7-6 alloy steel

2025· article· en· W4409451884 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Research and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersHenan Provincial Science and Technology Research ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMaterials scienceAlloyLayer (electronics)Constitutive equationMetallurgySurface layerComposite materialStructural engineeringFinite element methodEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the aerospace industry , various surface modification techniques are frequently employed to fabricate surface-modified layers (SMLs) on critical components, with the aim of enhancing the functionality and prolonging the operational lifespan. However, studies on the mechanical properties of SMLs are limited. This paper proposes a theoretical and experimental method based on layer-by-layer inversion for determining the Johnson–Cook (J–C) dynamic constitutive model parameters of SMLs via layer stripping. To establish the stress–strain relationships at varying carburization depths, strain rates , and temperatures, quasi-static compression tests , split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) dynamic impact compression tests, and high-temperature, quasi-static, tensile tests were performed. Using the layer-by-layer inversion approach, the J–C dynamic constitutive parameters for each gradient layer of the SML were obtained, and a functional relationship between the depth of the SML and the J–C dynamic constitutive parameters was established. Finally, the accuracy of the derived J–C dynamic constitutive model parameters in predicting the dynamic compression behavior of carburized 18CrNiMo7-6 alloy steel SMLs was verified through finite element simulations combined with high-temperature, dynamic compression experiments. This study offers a novel approach for determining the J–C dynamic constitutive model parameters in plastically nonlinear gradient materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it