Is There Any Effect of the Chronobiological Profile on Auditory Skills?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Öz Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, sirkadiyen kronotiplerin günün farklı saatlerindeki periferik ve santral işitsel performanslarını araştırmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Sabahçılık akşamcılık anketi ile kronotipleri belirlenen katılımcılara sabah ve akşam saatlerinde akustik immitans ölçümleri, Otoakustik Emisyon testi, Saf Ses Odyometri testi, Frekans Patern testi, Süre Patern testi (SPT), Gürültüde Türkçe Konuşma testi (TKT) ve İşitsel Sözel Öğrenme testi (İSÖT) uygulandı.Normal işiten ve montreal kognitif değerlendirme skoru ≥21 olan toplam 63 katılımcı çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir.Bulgular: Sabah tipleri İSÖT'nin A7 alt testinde sabah seansında anlamlı olarak daha yüksek puan aldı (p<0,05).Akşam tipleri akşam seansında TKT'de anlamlı derecede daha yüksek puan almıştır (p<0,05).Sabah testlerinde, sabah tiplerinin sol kulak SPT sonuçları ara tiplerden anlamlı derecede daha iyiydi (p<0,05).Akşam testlerinde, sabah tipleri TKT'de ara tiplerden anlamlı derecede daha iyi performans göstermiştir (p<0,05).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".