MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409463982 · doi:10.34190/ictr.8.1.3519

Looking at two decades of OTA research: A Bibliometric Approach

2025· article· en· W4409463982 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Tourism Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicERP Systems Implementation and Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManagement scienceRegional scienceGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Online Travel Agencies (OTAs) have profoundly influenced the hospitality and tourism industry, necessitating an understanding of the evolution of OTA research. This study employs bibliometric analysis to examine the progression, thematic structure, and future directions of OTA research from 2000 to February 2024. By analyzing publication trends, the study illustrates the increasing significance of OTA research, evidenced by its growing volume and acceleration rate. Three dominant themes—satisfaction, management and service quality, and consumer behavior—were identified, alongside five key co-citation clusters, including online reviews and eWOM, research methods and theory development, and channel distribution strategies. Co-word analysis revealed shifting focal points in OTA research, transitioning from loyalty (2005) to trust (2012) and behavior (2021). Co-word analysis further revealed shifting trends in OTA research, from loyalty (2005-2012) to trust (2012-2021) and behavior (mid-2021 onwards). Thematic analysis identified pivotal intellectual milestones, with revenue management and pricing strategy emerging as themes of high centrality but low knowledge development, emphasizing their importance yet underdeveloped state. This research recommends exploring collaborations between OTAs and hospitality stakeholders, including contracts, commissions, convergent marketing, and co-branding, while incorporating advancements in artificial intelligence and digital transformation. Therefore, future studies are recommended to incorporate these advanced analytical methods to present the most up-to-date ideas. In light of changing consumer behaviors driven by trends like post-COVID-19 risk aversion, digital transformation, and health consciousness, this study encourages research into subthemes such as solo travel and smart purchasing. This comprehensive analysis synthesizes two decades of OTA literature, offering a holistic view of its knowledge structure and progression. It provides valuable insights for both academia and practitioners by presenting an integrated overview of OTA research, identifying gaps, and proposing strategic directions. This study advances OTA research in hospitality and tourism, paving the way for future investigations of its industry impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0440.023
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.406
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.113 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it