Football on the frontlines: the unjust burden of the climate crisis on Pacific Island nations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oceania is a region which contributes little to anthropogenic causes of climate change yet bears many of its most immediate burdens. This can be demonstrated through football in the region as several member associations of the Oceania Football Confederation (OFC) are threatened by rising sea levels, floods, heat and other climate harms while lacking the organisational capacity to adapt to climate change. Using a climate justice lens to understand this disparity, this study provides a climate impact assessment to the OFC and its member associations. Focus groups and interviews with key stakeholders were used to assess organisational climate capacity with a goal of addressing the climate changed future of football in this region. Findings suggest all member associations are at risk of high heat and coastal flooding while others may face heavy rains and wildfires. Member associations are highly aware of their climate risks but lack many of the organisational resources necessary to adapt. This inherently demonstrates the injustice faced by this region as it is an immediate victim of climate change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it