MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409469209 · doi:10.11650/tjm/250405

On Relative Fields of Definition for Log Pairs, Vojta's Height Inequalities and Asymptotic Coordinate Size Dynamics

2025· article· en· W4409469209 on OpenAlex
Nathan Grieve, Chatchai Noytaptim

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueTaiwanese Journal of Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometry and complex manifolds
Canadian institutionsAcadia UniversityUniversité du Québec à MontréalCarleton UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsDynamics (music)InequalityMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We build on the perspective of the works [6, 8–10, 16] (and others) and study the dynamical arithmetic complexity of rational points in projective varieties. Our main results make progress towards the attractive problem of asymptotic complexity of coordinate size dynamics in the sense formulated by Matsuzawa, in [16, Question 1.1.2], and building on earlier work of Silverman [22]. A key tool to our approach here is a novel formulation of conjectural Vojta type inequalities for log canonical pairs and with respect to finite extensions of number fields. Among other features, these conjectured Diophantine arithmetic height inequalities raise the question of existence of log resolutions with respect to finite extensions of number fields which is another novel concept which we formulate in precise terms here and also which is of an independent interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it