MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409472480 · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106481

Approximate Bayesian inference for calibrating the IPCC tier-2 steady-state soil organic carbon model for Canadian croplands using long-term experimental data

2025· article· en· W4409472480 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nathan Pelletier, Arumugam Thiagarajan, Francis Durnin-Vermette, Dong-Wook Choo, Darrel Cerkowniak, Antoun Elkhoury, David W. Macdonald, Ward Smith, A.J. VandenBygaart

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Modelling & Software · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)Bayesian inferenceSoil carbonInferenceEnvironmental scienceBayesian probabilityCalibrationEconometricsSteady state (chemistry)Soil scienceComputer scienceMathematicsStatisticsSoil waterArtificial intelligenceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We conducted a Bayesian calibration of the IPCC tier-2 Steady-State (IPCCT2) model using long-term experimental (LTE) data from Canadian croplands. A global sensitivity analysis identified key parameters influencing the prediction of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, including those governing the temperature response curve, optimal decay rate in the passive pool, and stabilization efficiencies for decay products in different pools. We used Sampling-Importance-Resampling to obtain posterior parameter and hyperparameter distributions for the sensitive parameters and the tillage disturbance modifiers. The calibration significantly narrowed parameter ranges compared to the original parameter range provided by the IPCC guidelines, reducing relative uncertainty in SOC point estimates from 27-33 % to 3.5–4 % - an 85 % reduction in model uncertainties. However, calibration was much less efficient in reducing model uncertainties if the correlation structure in the posterior samples was unaccounted for. Calibrated parameters effectively minimized Root Mean Squared Error and bias in SOC predictions in a validation dataset. The default IPCC tier-2 steady-state model parameters performed comparably to those obtained from maximum a priori distributions. Our findings highlighted the broad nature of original IPCC guideline boundaries, leading to uncertain SOC stock predictions and limiting model informativeness and emphasizing the need for parties to adapt parameters to their country-specific conditions. Simulation results suggested that the calibrated model parameter ranges are essential for accurate predictions. When simulating the impact of reducing tillage or adding inorganic nitrogen to annual crops without manure amendments, model calibration substantially reduced uncertainties in long-term impact predictions—by ∼15 % for tillage and ∼75 % for nitrogen addition. This study underscores the accuracy of default IPCCT2 parameters in simulating SOC dynamics in Canadian LTE studies. However, it emphasizes the need for calibrated model parameters in conducting uncertainty analyses. The Bayesian calibration improved uncertainty assessments of cropland management practices leading to reliable carbon accounting. This work supports informed decision-making towards sustainable agriculture, guiding management strategies that optimize carbon storage while aligning with national and international carbon reporting frameworks. • ·Bayesian calibration of IPCC Tier 2 steady state SOC model was performed with Canadian long-term experimental data. • Calibration of Model parameters reduced uncertainty of the SOC predictions. • Calibration reduced uncertainty in evaluating impacts of tillage and N application on soil organic carbon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Modelling & SoftwareSame topicSoil Geostatistics and MappingFrench-language works237,207