MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409473303 · doi:10.2196/71691

Changes in Epidemiological Characteristics of Varicella and Breakthrough Cases in Ningbo, China, From 2010 to 2023: Surveillance Study

2025· article· en· W4409473303 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xingqiang Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintEpidemiologyEnvironmental healthGeographyMedicineComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Varicella is a prevalent respiratory infectious disease. Continuous monitoring is essential to understand evolving epidemiological patterns, particularly given the impact of vaccination and recent nonpharmacological interventions. Objective: This study aims to monitor the epidemiological characteristics of varicella and the changes in breakthrough cases to inform adjustments in immunization strategies and enhance prevention efforts. Methods: From 2010 to 2023, varicella incidence was monitored using active (2010-2011) and passive (2012-2023) surveillance methods. Data were obtained from the Chinese Center for Disease Prevention and Control's information system and Ningbo's Immunization Information System. The study period was divided into four intervals to analyze trends. A birth cohort (2009-2013) was established to examine breakthrough cases. A recurrent neural network model was constructed for deep learning analysis of incidence trends and the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions. Results: Between 2010 and 2023, a total of 70,163 varicella cases were reported in Ningbo. Seasonal distribution indicated two incidence troughs before 2020 and only one from 2020 to 2023. The predominant age of onset was 10-14 years, accounting for 23.93% (16,795/70,163) of cases. From 2010 to 2013, the highest incidence was among children aged 5-9 years; from 2014 to 2019, it shifted to those aged 10-14 years; and from 2020 to 2023, it was primarily among individuals aged 15-19 years. Following the introduction of a second vaccine dose (2014-2019), incidence among children younger than 10 years of age decreased, notably by 59.54% in those aged 1-4 years. Conversely, incidence among individuals aged 10 years and older increased, particularly by 123.78% in the 15-19 years age group, with a significant upward trend (Ptrend<.001). From 2020 to 2023, although incidence rates increased across age groups 15 years and older, the rise was modest. The average annual incidence rate of breakthrough cases after one vaccine dose was 83.40/100,000 (range, 51.21-119.50/100,000), significantly higher than the 24.80/100,000 (range, 17.67-32.90/100,000) observed after two doses. However, the incidence of breakthrough cases after the first dose declined following the implementation of the 2-dose program. The median time from vaccination to breakthrough case occurrence was 27 (IQR 17.50-48) months. The recurrent neural network model demonstrated high accuracy (mean squared error, 49.96) and indicated that implementation of emergency response and community lockdown measures in early 2020 correlated with a divergence between predicted and actual case numbers, suggesting an impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions on varicella transmission. Conclusions: The significant shifts in varicella epidemiology between 2010 and 2023 highlight the importance of continuous monitoring and proactive immunization adjustments. We recommend enhanced varicella surveillance focusing on adult populations, and a targeted increase in 2-dose vaccine coverage, particularly in high-risk environments such as high schools and universities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance→Same topicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments→French-language works237,207→