MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409473475 · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.122781

The tenuous geological record of Precambrian oceanic spreading centers; revisiting the Paleoproterozoic Purtuniq ophiolite sheeted dike complex, Nunavik, Canada

2025· article· en· W4409473475 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sacha Lafrance, Carl Guilmette, Jean H. Bédard, N M Rayner, Guy Mathieu

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Geology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Natural Resources and WildlifeGeological Survey of CanadaCentre de Géomatique du QuébecUniversité Laval
FundersCommission Géologique du CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune
KeywordsPrecambrianGeologyDikeOphiolitePaleontologyEarth scienceSeismologyGeochemistryTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sheeted dike complexes (SDC) are primary records of oceanic spreading centers, where dikes feed fissural volcanism above axial magma chambers. Their recognition provides unequivocal constraints on oceanic crust accretion at divergent plate boundaries through Earth's history. However, the identification of Precambrian SDCs has often hinged on field observations while their cogeneticity and coevality with the overlying basalt and underlying gabbro remain unaddressed. Here, we examine the SDC of the Watts Group (2.0 Ga), located in the Ungava Orogen (Canada) and interpreted as the oldest unequivocal remnant of a mid-ocean ridge, the ‘Purtuniq ophiolite’. The dominant calc-alkaline affinity of the mafic dikes contrasts with the tholeiitic host gabbro and basalt, ruling out cogeneticity. SHRIMP U Pb dating of zircon from a dike yields an older Archean population from inherited cores (2981 ± 19 Ma to 2663 ± 17 Ma) overgrown by metamorphic rims (1815 ± 11 Ma). The presence of Archean inherited grains in the dikes is consistent with geochemical indicators of contamination by a felsic component. We conclude that the dikes do not represent a SDC but rather an isolated, petrogenetically unrelated dike array intruding the Watts Group. The ‘Purtuniq Ophiolite’ is thus only comprised of basalt and gabbro that are likely part of the Minto-Povungnituk Large Igneous Province (LIP) and does not represent a remnant of oceanic crust formed at a spreading center. A review of 19 possible cases of pre-850 Ma SDC-bearing ophiolites shows there is no definitive evidence for old SDCs formed in a modern-style oceanic spreading center. • SDCs record oceanic spreading centers and are cogenetic and coeval with underlying gabbro and overlying basalt. • The oldest (2.0 Ga) and most widely accepted case of seafloor spreading, the ‘Purtuniq Ophiolite’ or Watts Group, is revealed to be an isolated, petrogenetically unrelated dike array. • A review of 19 cases predating 850 million years finds no definitive evidence for oceanic spreading centers, challenging their representation in Earth's early crustal history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207