MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409473625 · doi:10.1109/tase.2025.3560956

Only Pick Once: Algorithms for Efficiently Picking an Exact Number of Multiple Identical Objects

2025· article· en· W4409473625 on OpenAlexaff
Zihe Ye, Ricardo Frumento, Yu Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Picking up multiple objects at once is a grasping skill that makes a human worker efficient in many domains. This work tackles the problem of getting a requested number of identical objects in a shallow bin by only pick once (OPO) using a simple parallel gripper. The proposed system contains several graph-based algorithms that convert the layout of objects into a graph, cluster vertices in the graph, rank and select candidate clusters based on their topology. Our algorithm also has a multi-object picking predictor based on a convolutional neural network for estimating how many objects would be picked up with a given gripper location and orientation. This paper presents four evaluation metrics and three protocols to evaluate the proposed system. The results show that our proposed system has very high success rates for two and three objects when only picking once. Utilizing our approach can significantly outperform single object picking two to three times in terms of efficiency. The results also show our algorithm can be applied to one unseen shape (hexagon) and unseen sizes cube and cylinder during training without fine-tuning to achieve decent accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and EngineeringSame topicOptimization and Search ProblemsFrench-language works237,207