Only Pick Once: Algorithms for Efficiently Picking an Exact Number of Multiple Identical Objects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Picking up multiple objects at once is a grasping skill that makes a human worker efficient in many domains. This work tackles the problem of getting a requested number of identical objects in a shallow bin by only pick once (OPO) using a simple parallel gripper. The proposed system contains several graph-based algorithms that convert the layout of objects into a graph, cluster vertices in the graph, rank and select candidate clusters based on their topology. Our algorithm also has a multi-object picking predictor based on a convolutional neural network for estimating how many objects would be picked up with a given gripper location and orientation. This paper presents four evaluation metrics and three protocols to evaluate the proposed system. The results show that our proposed system has very high success rates for two and three objects when only picking once. Utilizing our approach can significantly outperform single object picking two to three times in terms of efficiency. The results also show our algorithm can be applied to one unseen shape (hexagon) and unseen sizes cube and cylinder during training without fine-tuning to achieve decent accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".