Low-Power, Low-Energy, Static, Contention-Free, TSPC Dual-Edge Triggered Flip-Flops
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dual edge-triggered flip-flop samples the data on both the positive and negative edges of the clock. Hence, it can lead to lower clock relative power consumption as compared to the single-edge triggered flip-flop while maintaining the same data throughput. In this paper, we present two low-power, low-energy dual-edge triggered TSPC flip-flops based on latch-mux type methodology. These two flip-flops, Low-Power at Low Data Activity (LPLD-DET), and Low-Power at High Data Activity (LPHD-DET) are suitable for low-power application. These flip-flops are fully static and contention-free. The post-layout simulation results in TSMC CMOS 65 nm technology suggest that the proposed LPLD-DET is the most power-efficient dual-edge triggered flip-flop for low data activities up to 30%, and LPHD-DET is the most power-efficient dual-edge triggered flip-flop for higher data activities from 45% compared to the other state-of-the-art dual-edge triggered TSPC flip-flops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".