MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409487638 · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00567

Delineation of the trigeminal-lateral parabrachial-central amygdala tract in humans

2025· article· en· W4409487638 on OpenAlex
Batu Kaya, Omari S. Khalil, Spencer S. Abssy, Iacopo Cioffi, Massieh Moayedi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueImaging Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalKrembil FoundationUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcDonnell Center for Systems NeuroscienceNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of TorontoCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsParabrachial NucleusNeuroscienceAmygdalaLateral parabrachial nucleusMedicineAnatomyBiologyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The parabrachial nucleus (PBN) relays interoceptive and exteroceptive information to limbic brain regions. In particular, lateral PBN projections to the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) are thought to encode the affective dimension of pain. Pain in the orofacial region is thought to be more unpleasant than pain elsewhere in the body because the face plays an important role in social interactions, feeding, and exploration. The trigeminal nerve (CN V) carries sensory, including nociceptive, information from the orofacial region to the central nervous system. Canonically, the affective dimension of orofacial pain is thought to be encoded by the medial trigeminothalamic tract, which projects to midline thalamic nuclei and further to limbic brain regions. A preclinical study identified an additional circuit that carries orofacial nociceptive information to subcortical limbic brain regions via the lateral PBN. This circuit, from the CN V to the lateral PBN and further to the CeA, is thought to contribute to the heightened negative affect of orofacial pain. However, the CN V–lateral PBN–CeA circuit has yet to be delineated in humans. Here, we aimed to resolve this circuit in humans with diffusion MRI from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) using probabilistic tractography. We first delineated the tract at 7T (n = 150) to determine whether this tract can be resolved. Next, we delineated the tract at the more readily available, but lower resolution 3T field strength (n = 155). Given the growing evidence of sex differences in pain mechanisms, as a secondary aim, we explored whether sex differences in connectivity strengths of the circuit existed in our sample. The basolateral amygdala (BLAT) was used as a negative control, as we did not anticipate CN V-lPBN-BLAT connectivity. The CN V–lPBN–CeA circuit had significantly stronger connectivity strength than the BLAT circuit at both field strengths (both p < 0.001). Only the right CN V–lPBN–CeA circuit at 3T showed significantly stronger connectivity in males than in females (p = 0.002). This study delineated the human CN V–lPBN–CeA circuit for the first time in vivo. This circuit may provide a neuroanatomical substrate for the heightened negative affect elicited by orofacial pain and could serve as a potential therapeutic target.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it