MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409493249 · doi:10.4000/13rjg

Gérard Haddad. “Lumières des astres éteints. La psychanalyse face aux camps”

2012· article· fr· W4409493249 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Enaudeau

Bibliographic record

VenueTémoigner. Entre Histoire et Mémoire · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

« Leur savoir [celui des psychanalystes] a été construit et mis à l’épreuve “au-dehors”, dans le monde que, pour simplifier, nous appelions “civilisé”… Leurs interprétations, même celles de ceux qui, tel Bruno Bettelheim, ont traversé l’épreuve du Lager, me paraissent approximatives et simplifiées. » Jusqu’au milieu des années 1960, la communauté des analystes n’a pas été plus attentive que le commun de la société française à l’égard des camps organisés pour l’extermination et la mort, princ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0070.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTémoigner. Entre Histoire et MémoireSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207