MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409494094 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0320089

A novel decision ensemble framework: Attention-customized BiLSTM and XGBoost for speculative stock price forecasting

2025· article· en· W4409494094 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicStock Market Forecasting Methods
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsComputer scienceInterpretabilityMachine learningVolatility (finance)Artificial intelligenceStock marketData miningEconometricsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forecasting speculative stock prices is essential for effective investment risk management and requires innovative algorithms. However, the speculative nature, volatility, and complex sequential dependencies within financial markets present inherent challenges that necessitate advanced techniques. In this regard, a novel framework, ACB-XDE (Attention-Customized BiLSTM-XGB Decision Ensemble), is proposed for predicting the daily closing price of speculative stock Bitcoin-USD (BTC-USD). The proposed ACB-XDE framework integrates the learning capabilities of a customized Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) model with a novel attention mechanism and the XGBoost algorithm. The customized BiLSTM leverages its learning capabilities to capture complex sequential dependencies and speculative market trends. Meanwhile, the new attention mechanism dynamically assigns weights to influential features based on volatility patterns, thereby enhancing interpretability and optimizing effective cost measures and volatility forecasting. Moreover, XGBoost handles nonlinear relationships and contributes to the proposed ACB-XDE framework's robustness. Furthermore, the error reciprocal method improves predictions by iteratively adjusting model weights based on the difference between theoretical expectations and actual errors in the individual attention-customized BiLSTM and XGBoost models. Finally, the predictions from both the XGBoost and attention-customized BiLSTM models are concatenated to create a varied prediction space, which is then fed into the ensemble regression framework to improve the generalization capabilities of the proposed ACB-XDE framework. Empirical validation of the proposed ACB-XDE framework involves its application to the volatile Bitcoin market, utilizing a dataset sourced from Yahoo Finance (Bitcoin-USD, 10/01/2014 to 01/08/2023). The proposed ACB-XDE framework outperforms state-of-the-art models with a MAPE of 0.37%, MAE of 84.40, and RMSE of 106.14. This represents improvements of approximately 27.45%, 53.32%, and 38.59% in MAPE, MAE, and RMSE respectively, over the best-performing attention-BiLSTM. The proposed ACB-XDE framework presents a technique for informed decision-making in dynamic financial landscapes and demonstrates effectiveness in handling the complexities of BTC-USD data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.104
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.104
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.250
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it