An Efficient and Scalable Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus for Vehicular Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vehicular networks represent a new distributed system paradigm that requires robust fault tolerance to ensure reliable operation. As a burgeoning area of research, the scalability and optimization of consensus mechanisms for these networks are critical. Traditional Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) algorithms like PBFT are not inherently optimized for the localized needs of vehicular networks, suffering from scalability issues due to their global nature and high messaging complexity. In response, we introduce a two-tiered consensus framework that refines PBFT for the specific context of vehicular networks. By organizing nodes into clusters based on geographic proximity, our approach reduces messaging complexity from$O(n^{2})$to$O(n^{1.5})$, significantly improving scalability. The framework distinguishes between local and global state transitions, adding two phases to the PBFT protocol to manage these efficiently. This tailored consensus process aligns with the localized communication patterns of vehicular networks, enhancing both efficiency and scalability. The framework addresses the critical challenges of traditional BFT algorithms in vehicular networks, offering a solution that is both scalable and resilient. It is a step toward enabling vehicular networks to fulfil their potential as a reliable component of modern distributed systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".