Oxidation Assessment and Impact of Pre-oxidation on Hot Corrosion Behavior of Fe- and Ni-based Alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, we first validated the oxidation performance of Alloy 800 (Fe-based alloy) and 625 (Ni-based alloy) within the temperature range of 700-1000 °C. After 24 hours of oxidation at 1000°C in air, the mass gain is measured as 2.53 and 1.86 mg/cm2 for Alloy 800 and 625, respectively, with their increase rates approximately reaching 6 times compared with those at 900 °C. The main oxidation scale in both two alloys is identified as a Cr2O3 layer with minor NiCr2O4 from 800-1000 °C. A crucial facet of this investigation involved subjecting the alloys to pre-oxidation treatment at 1000 °C for 24 hours, resulting in reduced mass gain during subsequent hot corrosion evaluations with NaCl/Na2SO4 salts at 900°C, particularly noticeable in Alloy 800, where a dense oxidation layer formed. However, cross-sections of both two alloys show a deep penetration by Na and O. These findings reveal the limited protective role of the Cr2O3 layer in augmenting resistance to hot corrosion while offering valuable insights into materials' performance in high-temperature environments and industrial applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".