MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409501062 · doi:10.5006/c2023-19216

Corrosion Performance of UNS S31000 under Batch-mode Hydrothermal Liquefaction (HTL) Conversion of Different Biomass

2023· article· en· W4409501062 on OpenAlexaff
Haoyu Wang, Xue Han, Minkang Liu, Yimin Zeng, Chunbao Xu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrothermal circulationCorrosionHydrothermal liquefactionBiomass (ecology)LiquefactionMode (computer interface)MetallurgyEnvironmental scienceMaterials sciencePulp and paper industryWaste managementGeologyChemical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringBiofuelGeotechnical engineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is an important thermochemical technology which uses hot pressurized water to convert wet biomass or biowaste feedstocks into biocrude oils and other marketable bio-chemicals. The presence of hot pressurized water, aggressive catalyst, and organic products can lead to serious corrosion damage and even stress corrosion cracking risk on the HTL reactors. Up to now, very limited information is available about the corrosion of HTL reactor alloys under HTL processes. In this study, the corrosion of a candidate constructional steel (UNS S31000) was investigated under the batch-mode HTL conversion of different biomass feedstocks, including bamboo (a typical lignocellulosic biomass) and black liquor (a common industrial biowaste). The bio-oil produced from black liquor had higher contents of organic acids and phenols compared to that converted from bamboo. The corrosion rate of the steel in the HTL of black liquor was about twenty-five times higher than that in the HTL of bamboo. The corrosion layer formed in the HTL of black liquor is spalling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPetroleum Processing and Analysis→French-language works237,207→