MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409501375 · doi:10.1093/imamat/hxaf008

Stochastic generalized Kolmogorov systems with small diffusion. II: Explicit approximations for periodic solutions in distribution

2025· article· en· W4409501375 on OpenAlexafffund
Baoquan Zhou, Hao Wang, Tianxu Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Applied Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAquatic and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsDiffusionApplied mathematicsApproximations of πDistribution (mathematics)Statistical physicsMathematical analysisPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper is Part II of a two-part series on coexistence states study in stochastic generalized Kolmogorov systems under small diffusion. Part I provided a complete characterization for approximating invariant probability measures and density functions, while here, we focus on explicit approximations for periodic solutions in distribution. Two easily implementable methods are introduced: periodic normal approximation and periodic log-normal approximation. These methods offer unified algorithms to calculate the mean and covariance matrix, and verify positive definiteness, without additional constraints like non-degenerate diffusion. Furthermore, we explore essential properties of the covariance matrix, particularly its connection under periodic and non-periodic drift coefficients. Our new approximation methods significantly relax the minimal criteria for positive definiteness of the solution of the discrete-type Lyapunov equation. Some numerical experiments are provided to support our theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIMA Journal of Applied MathematicsSame topicAquatic and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207