MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409501796 · doi:10.5006/c2022-18006

The Development of Environmentally Acceptable Corrosion Inhibitors for Sour Applications

2022· article· en· W4409501796 on OpenAlexaff
Jody Hoshowski, Rolando Pérez, Alyn Jenkins

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsSchlumberger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionSour gasEnvironmentally friendlyMaterials scienceMetallurgyComputer scienceBiochemical engineeringEngineeringWaste managementBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Production chemical regulations in the North Sea oil and gas sector restrict the use of environmentally harmful substances and require chemical providers to replace such products with environmentally acceptable alternatives. Environmentally acceptable corrosion inhibitors that are used in oil and gas production are non-toxic, biodegradable, and have a low impact on the marine environment. Such inhibitors are designed to protect mild steel from the effects of corrosion in systems containing acid gas, organic acids, and the influence of temperature. In this work, two oilfields in the North Sea required the development of environmentally acceptable corrosion inhibitors, to replace environmentally harmful products. The new products were required to offer similar or improved efficacy to the incumbent inhibitors in a sour environment and to be cost-effective. Laboratory tests were performed to represent field conditions and ranged in temperature, H2S, and CO2 concentration as well as water cut and shear stress. Products were found to be effective to the corrosion rate limit of <4 mpy and with no pitting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207