MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409504327 · doi:10.1038/s43018-025-00967-6

Author Correction: Odronextamab monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma: primary efficacy and safety analysis in phase 2 ELM-2 trial

2025· erratum· en· W4409504327 on OpenAlexaff
Won Seog Kim, Tae Min Kim, Seok‐Goo Cho, Isidro Jarque, Elżbieta Iskierka‐Jazdzewska, Li Mei Poon, H. Miles Prince, Huilai Zhang, Junning Cao, Mingzhi Zhang, Benoît Tessoulin, Sung Yong Oh, Francesca Lim, Cecilia Carpio, Tran‐Der Tan, Sabarish Ayyappan, Antonio Gutiérrez, Jingxian Cai, Melanie Ufkin, Saleem Shariff, Jurriaan Brouwer‐Visser, Aafia Chaudhry, Hesham Mohamed, Srikanth Ambati, Jan Walewski

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Cancer · 2025
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefractory (planetary science)Diffuse large B-cell lymphomaMedicineOncologyInternal medicineClinical trialPhases of clinical researchLymphomaMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article was originally published under standard Springer Nature license (© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.). It is now available as an open-access paper under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, © The Author(s). The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.057
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CancerSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207