Répondre aux besoins sensoriels d’élèves autistes à l’école : des pistes tirées des stratégies des parents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article décrit les stratégies des parents à la maison pour répondre aux besoins sensoriels de leur enfant dans le cadre de leurs tâches liées au travail domestique et de soin. Six parents d’enfants autistes ayant une déficience intellectuelle moyenne à sévère scolarisés en école spécialisée ont participé à un entretien. Les parents décrivent des actions faites avec/par l’enfant et sur l’environnement, mais peu d’utilisation de matériels spécialisés coûteux. Ces actions sont individualisées et imbriquées dans les activités et routines familiales, tout en étant flexibles et en considérant la sécurité de l’enfant. Cet article permet de mieux comprendre les considérations entourant les besoins sensoriels dans le travail domestique et de soin prodigué et propose des pistes pour la classe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".