MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409513108 · doi:10.1155/atr/4851103

A Review of Research on Flight Delay Propagation: Current Situation and Prospect

2025· review· en· W4409513108 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
N. Li, Hongguang Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAir Traffic Management and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)AeronauticsAerospace engineeringComputer scienceOperations researchEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The correlation between flight routes makes the initial delays easy to cause chain delays of downstream airports, forming a large area of delays. Studying delay propagation can block its propagation path and alleviate large‐scale delay problems. This paper first systematically collects relevant academic literature from the past decade and constructs a co‐occurrence keyword network to analyze and reveal the research hotspots in flight delay propagation. Then, based on the two major categories of delay propagation within airlines and between airports, this paper provides a detailed review and summary of their research methods. For the research of delay propagation within airlines, scholars mainly use econometric models, Bayesian networks, function models, and propagation trees to analyze the influencing factors and propagation characteristics of delay propagation. Among the methods for predicting delay propagation, models based on machine learning algorithms account for a large proportion and have shown good prediction performance. For the more complex delay propagation problem between airports, researchers mainly use the time interval Petri net, queuing network model, Cox proportional hazards model, and complex network theory to analyze the delay propagation mechanism in aviation networks. In addition, deep learning models and spatiotemporal network models have improved the accuracy of interairport flight delay prediction due to their ability to process large datasets and high‐dimensional feature data. Finally, this paper summarizes the progress and shortcomings in flight delay propagation. The results show that there are significant differences in the delay propagation mechanism between airlines and airports, which requires full consideration of their applicability when selecting predictive models. Traditional machine learning methods perform well in the internal delay prediction of airlines, but there are some limitations in dealing with the complex and changeable propagation environment between airports. On the contrary, deep learning models and spatiotemporal models have opened up a new path for improving prediction accuracy by their powerful data processing and analysis capabilities. At the same time, researchers also need to constantly explore and optimize algorithms to overcome their current limitations and further improve the reliability of predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicAir Traffic Management and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207