MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409513108 · doi:10.1155/atr/4851103

A Review of Research on Flight Delay Propagation: Current Situation and Prospect

2025· review· en· W4409513108 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAir Traffic Management and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)AeronauticsAerospace engineeringComputer scienceOperations researchEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The correlation between flight routes makes the initial delays easy to cause chain delays of downstream airports, forming a large area of delays. Studying delay propagation can block its propagation path and alleviate large‐scale delay problems. This paper first systematically collects relevant academic literature from the past decade and constructs a co‐occurrence keyword network to analyze and reveal the research hotspots in flight delay propagation. Then, based on the two major categories of delay propagation within airlines and between airports, this paper provides a detailed review and summary of their research methods. For the research of delay propagation within airlines, scholars mainly use econometric models, Bayesian networks, function models, and propagation trees to analyze the influencing factors and propagation characteristics of delay propagation. Among the methods for predicting delay propagation, models based on machine learning algorithms account for a large proportion and have shown good prediction performance. For the more complex delay propagation problem between airports, researchers mainly use the time interval Petri net, queuing network model, Cox proportional hazards model, and complex network theory to analyze the delay propagation mechanism in aviation networks. In addition, deep learning models and spatiotemporal network models have improved the accuracy of interairport flight delay prediction due to their ability to process large datasets and high‐dimensional feature data. Finally, this paper summarizes the progress and shortcomings in flight delay propagation. The results show that there are significant differences in the delay propagation mechanism between airlines and airports, which requires full consideration of their applicability when selecting predictive models. Traditional machine learning methods perform well in the internal delay prediction of airlines, but there are some limitations in dealing with the complex and changeable propagation environment between airports. On the contrary, deep learning models and spatiotemporal models have opened up a new path for improving prediction accuracy by their powerful data processing and analysis capabilities. At the same time, researchers also need to constantly explore and optimize algorithms to overcome their current limitations and further improve the reliability of predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it